Looking for input..

John and I are giving a presentation at Iona College in two weeks entitled "Global Applization: The Impact of Mobile Apps on Global Business Practices and Processes." And, yes, the word "Applization" is our creation.

We are looking for some specific information on enterprise mobile apps being developed by enterprises or third-parties for enterprises. We are interested in their purpose, audience (employees, vendors/suppliers, customers), the mobile platform, distribution, and any other significant fact about them (are they mashups, include location processing, are they social?).

Any thoughts you have on the impact of mobile apps on globalized businesses and markets are also appreciated; how they impact competition, remove borders and barriers to international trade and business, for instance.

Thank you for your input.

Barbara

Respond to either:

bobbee512@gmail.com or

johnmac13@gmail.com

Iona College, Hagan School of Business, Summer Symposium

Innovation, Technology and Globalization

A Panel Discussion

Saturday, June 20, 2009

11:00 AM to 12:30 PM

Did You Know? Video on rapid global social changes driven by new technologies, researched and created by educators Karl Kisch, Scott McLeod, and Jeff Bronman.

Available, with commentary, on the Web2themag.com, Weekly Update for June 16, 2009.

http://web2themag.com/index_files/WeeklyUpdate090616.htm

Also available directly on YouTube.com at:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cL9Wu2kWwSY

The Failed Promise of Innovation in the U.S. by Michael Mandel, Business Week, June 3, 2009

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/09_24/b4135000953288_page_1.htm

"We live in an era of rapid innovation." I'm sure you've heard that phrase, or some variant, over and over again. The evidence appears to be all around us: Google (GOOG), Facebook, Twitter, smartphones, flat-screen televisions, the Internet itself.”

“But what if the conventional wisdom is wrong? What if outside of a few high-profile areas, the past decade has seen far too few commercial innovations that can transform lives and move the economy forward? What if, rather than being an era of rapid innovation, this has been an era of innovation interrupted? And if that's true, is there any reason to expect the next decade to be any better?”

THE TOPIC:

Competition in the global marketplace has spurred new ways of doing business that require collaboration within the supply chain, enabled and controlled by technology. New technology-supported business models enhance competition, dramatically reduce costs, provide superior customer support and enable rapid response to dynamic global markets.

Cloud computing may be the ultimate form of globalization. IBM has stepped up to the challenge with initiatives that will help reduce enterprise computing costs dramatically while enhancing collaboration. Cloud computing, mashups, and SOA are strategic business enablers as well as technologies. Dion Hinchcliffe, ZDNET.COM blogger, predicts that “smart companies who compete in the global marketplace will partner with the marketplace over the network with customer communities, cloud sourcing, and crowdsourcing to find new opportunities for low cost growth while doing more with less.”

U.S. companies are also leveraging Web 2.0 tools internally to foster employee engagement through collaboration and social networking. Wikis and blogs on internal sites encourage employees, with incentives, to be a part of solutions. Extending the corporate community globally to customers and vendors changes the entire culture of an organization and its market.

The mobile phone, perhaps matched only by the toothbrush in terms of its ubiquity, is the ultimate global device. With over 4 billion people today using one, the barriers for connectivity in all parts of the world have never been lower. The next challenge for the technology industry is to expand from phone calls to services of all kind, as the mobile devices themselves become location aware, multi-media computers. Nokia, as a world leader in mobile devices and the converging digital industry is investing heavily to bring new solutions to people around the world that combine devices with context aware services. As data proliferates and becomes a valuable business asset, complex issues of data access and ownership, ease of use and consumer trust become ever more important.

The role of US technology globally is a primary concern of the US Dept of Commerce, which has been active in pressing for the removal of legal and regulatory barriers to technology deployment outside the US and to promote workable international agreements that sustain U.S. technology development. Complex issues hamper progress in this area, including, and most especially, those of security.

Mondial Trade Compliance Services & Solutions Inc. helps companies wade through the maze of trade laws and regulations. The challenge, as highlighted on the Mondial web site is “keeping the most sensitive goods out of the most dangerous hands” without negatively impacting global trade and competition.

Global companies are using online and Web 2.0 technologies to build a more efficient supply chain as well as enabling them to adjust more quickly to changing market dynamics. Can these technologies, which emphasize online collaboration, networking, and user-created content, also help ensure compliance with the myriad country-specific security and trade regulations? What are the inhibitors? What are the risks?

THE PANEL:

A panel of experts will help attendees understand the new technologies in terms of enabling new and expanding business models as well as the global trade compliance issues that impact a technology-driven global economy. The panel will:

• explain the important new technologies and their significance;
• discuss how collaborative technologies are changing the way in which U.S. businesses compete globally;
• outline how new technologies can sustain low cost growth;
• identify challenges and barriers to successful global technology deployment;
• explore complex issues surrounding trade compliance and technology;
• identify key steps needed to enable companies to successfully leverage U.S. innovation and invention for increased world market share.

THE PANELISTS:

Dr. Hagen Wenzek, Senior Strategist, IBM Corporate Strategy.

Mitchell Weinberg, President and Chief Executive Officer, Mondial Trade Compliance Services & Solutions Inc.

Stephen Johnston, Senior Manager, Business Development, Nokia Services, Nokia Inc.

Moderator: Barbara E. McMullen, Iona College.

Dr. Hagen Wenzek

Senior Strategist

IBM Corporate Strategy

Hagen Wenzek is a Senior Strategist in IBM's Corporate Strategy department. He manages the development of major corporate growth strategies of IBM on a global basis. In his role Hagen oversees the creation of new business designs, value propositions, and market insight. He develops the strategic guidance to the corporation that enables IBM, its clients and partners to respond successfully to global challenges. His current priority is to develop IBM’s cloud computing strategy and execution planning as well as actively participate in business development of cloud computing opportunities. Furthermore, as the liaison between senior management in EMEA and Corporate Strategy, Dr. Wenzek is part of the team of the Chairman IBM Europe, Middle-East and Africa (EMEA).

Previously at IBM Corporate Strategy Hagen Wenzek quantified IBM’s energy & environment strategy, worked on services science, healthcare, emerging markets, and the impact of globalization.

Hagen Wenzek supports the development of thought leadership material for IBM through books, articles and whitepapers, has speaking engagements at conferences and renowned universities such as Columbia, MIT or ETH Zurich, looks after master theses and other research topics on business strategy, organizational change and technological influence on business ecosystems.

Hagen earned a Doctoral degree for Electrical Engineering at the University of Hagen, Germany, and an Masters degree at the University of Aachen, Germany. He is fluent in German and English, an active triathlete and lives in Tarrytown, New York.

He can be reached at +1-914-499-5024 (work) or hwenzek@us.ibm.com.

Mitchell Weinberg

President and Chief Executive Officer

Mondial Trade Compliance Services & Solutions Inc. (USA and Canada), Pte Ltd (Singapore), Shanghai Co., Ltd. (People’s Republic of China) and Limited (United Kingdom)

Mitchell Weinberg is the founder, President and Chief Executive Officer Mondial Trade Compliance Services and Solutions Inc. Mitchell is a graduate of Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada where he obtained a Bachelor of Arts in Pre-Law and Sociology and the McGill University School of Law in Montreal, Canada where he obtained his Common Law (LL.B) and Civil Law (B.C.L.) degrees in 1991. During his tenure at McGill, Mitchell worked in the Legal Services Department of the Canadian National Transportation Agency where he provided legal advice on matters involving air, ocean and rail transportation law. Mitchell began his career as a lawyer at Ontario Hydro in Toronto, Canada where he served as both litigation and corporate counsel to the largest public utility in North America. Seeking new challenges, Mitchell resigned from Ontario Hydro in 1998 to join Future Electronics in Montreal, Canada, the world’s third largest distributor of electronic components. Within a year of joining Future Electronics, Mitchell was promoted to the position of Vice-President and General Counsel, where he was responsible for overseeing, Future’s global trade compliance, legal, human resources and corporate security functions.

As head of the trade compliance group at Future Electronics, Mitchell was responsible for Future Electronics’ global trade compliance program and regional compliance teams in Canada, the United States, Asia and Europe. During this time he built a global Trade Compliance program that exceeded best practice standards and that was recognized as the ‘gold standard’ by many customs and government officials worldwide. He oversaw a team of 38 compliance professionals as well as all aspects of the trade compliance function. Mitchell interfaced regularly with his colleagues on the executive management team at Future Electronics to promote and ensure corporate trade compliance. Mitchell was also the primary contact for Future Electronics for government regulators and was frequently consulted by various government officials for assistance in trade compliance investigations. Mitchell is well versed on all types of trade compliance related matters. Mitchell is also fluent in English and French.

Mitchell has had dealings with all types of import and export-related matters, including audits, investigations, prior and voluntary disclosures of violations, export licensing of military and "dual use" products and technology, the classification and valuation of merchandise, marking and country of origin issues, free trade agreements, foreign trade zones, drawback and other duty savings mechanisms.

Mitchell resigned from Future Electronics in February of 2007 to found Mondial Trade Compliance Services and Solutions. With worldwide headquarters in New York City, New York, Mondial is a global trade and trade compliance consulting firm with offices throughout North, South and Central America, Europe and Asia. Mondial is comprised of a network of trade consultants representing over 20 countries around the world. Mondial assists its clients with all aspects of trade, regardless of location.

Stephen Johnston

Senior Manager, Business Development

Nokia Services, Nokia Inc.

Stephen is a Senior Manager in Nokia’s new Services unit, working on Internet business development and consumer services.

He joined Nokia in 2003 to work on identifying future global trends that impact Nokia’s business strategy. Since then he’s focused on developing Nokia’s Internet and social media strategy, the impact of Web2.0 and developing disruptive business models internally and via partnerships and M&A.

Stephen received an Innovation Award in 2005 for creating the Nokia Podcasting application which is now shipped with most Nokia phones, and has long been an advocate internally and in the media for the use of distributed social media such as blogs and wikis to improve teamwork and enhance innovation.

In 2006 he founded and led “Nokia2.0” – a cross-company, bottom-up Internet innovation initiative that helped bring about change in mindset, processes and business models to facilitate Nokia’s ongoing strategic transition to being an Internet services company.

Before Nokia, Stephen worked in Brussels for the Trade Directorate of the European Commission and then on trade and ecommerce policy for Daimler, Suez, Siebel and Bertelsmann. He has an MA in Economics from Cambridge University, and an MBA from Harvard Business School, where he was a Fulbright Scholar. He lives with his wife in New York, enjoys sailing and triathlons, and blogs at http://3dpeople.blogspot.com

A New Thread: Web 2.0 – A Promise Kept?

Educators have been promoting the value of integrating technology into the curriculum for decades – at least as far back as the roll-out of the Apple II computer (and perhaps earlier). I look to you and John McMullen for clarity here on the time frame. I know I started teaching with technology in 1980 at New York University.

We have come a very long way in this time. I still vividly remember Prasad, my graduate assistant and normally a very low key kind of guy, come leaping into my office at Marist College, where I was Acting Director of Academic Computing, in 1990, to pronounce that Marist had an operational web server for faculty and students. All the content we put up on it could be viewed through a web browser, Mosaic, from anywhere in the world, from any computer attached to the Internet! At the birth of Marist Country, the name we gave our server, there were less than 1,000 web servers in the entire world.

Over these years organizations have spent hours and hours creating content for their web servers. There are multi-dozens of job titles for web content creation and maintenance. We are all used to how it works. The Web Master rules!

Now we have a whole new phenomenon – it is called Web 2.0. In a nutshell, Web 2.0 is the dream of a lifetime, it is the promise of the user-built, user-centered, user-run Internet. As the web started to return to its social roots with the familiar blogs and wikis, the creative minds started to take those leaps that always seem to get us into trouble eventually. Social media took a giant step when it became viral. Facebook and MySpace encouraged a whole new generation of marketing geniuses and the concept of viral marketing took off. After all, there must be money to be made here, or is there?

Many unconventional ideas are associated with Web 2.0 and Web 2.0 applications, adding hesitancy to adoption by some organizations that have traveled the whole gamut from total freedom and democracy to a prison like locked down dictatorship. When I first started using the Internet and someone brought up privacy, I knew immediately that using it meant losing my privacy forever. I have accepted this fact all these years. I have no secrets from anyone.

In O’Reilly’s “What is Web 2.0” we are told Web 2.0 is “an attitude, not a technology.” Web 2.0 applications are always in beta. The software gets better as more people use it. It is “hackable.” Trust your users. (www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a/6228). Try telling your local church or your company or almost any group today that has dealt with web site security, that you are going to set up a fancy multimedia web site that is going to attract people to it like nothing else has, and that has these characteristics.

As of today I can think of the following important Web 2.0 applications: LinkedIn (the most important after Facebook and MySpace), Twitter, Flickr, YouTube, de.licio.us, Digg, Ning (my favorite), KickApps, StumbleUpon, FarkIt!, blogs, wikis, and your favorite one.

You can stay up on all the Web 2.0 applications and tools by reading the Internet magazine, Web 2.0 The Magazine. Weekly updates are also available (web2themag.com).

Of course, I cannot end this thought without a mention of 3DVR, a topic I will expand upon in subsequent postings. Second Life is probably the most important of these right now and one I am particularly interested in.

I hope you join this discussion early. In this post I talk about how we got to Web 2.0 and what some of its basic characteristics are. I encourage more in this vein in response to this post. Please hold off on 3DVR and how we are going to use all this in education for subsequent posts or start a new post on the subject of your choosing and I will chime in.

Also, what is your favorite Web 2.0 application? Which ones did I miss?

http://mcmandmcm.ning.com/

McMullen & McMullen and Associates Network

Bibliography #2 (peripherals)

Bibliography (P)

Adner, Ron (2002).
When Are Technologies Disruptive? A Demand-Based View of the Emergence of Competition.
Strategic Management Journal 23(8): 667-88.

Arthur Levine (2005)
Leadership – All That Glitters

Beldarrain Yoany
Distance Education Trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction
And collaboration.
Distance Education; Aug2006, Vol. 27 Issue2, p139, 14p

Berry L. (1995)
Relationship Marketing of Services – Growing Interest, Emerging Perspectives
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 237-245

Boehner, J. (February 4, 2005).
Keynote Address made at the 2005 CHEA Conference in Phoenix, AZ.
Source: CHEA Update No. 18.
http://www.chea.org/Government/HEAupdate/CHEA_HEA18.htm
Accessed May 23, 2005

Borja, R.R. (May 5, 2005).
Cyber schools status. Education
Week, pp. 22-23.

Brody, W.R. (May 9, 2005).
A funny thing happened on the way
to the classroom. The Johns Hopkins University Gazette, 34 (33), p. 2

Carr Sarah
As Distance Education Comes of Age, the Challenge is keeping the Students
Chronicle of Higher Education (Feb 11, 2000)

Carnevale, D. (April 30, 2004).
For Online Adjuncts, a Seller's Market.
The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A31.

Charitou, Constantinos D. and Markides, Constantinos C. (2003).
Responses to Disruptive Strategic Innovation.
MIT Sloan Management Review 44(2):55-63


Christensen, Clayton M. and Overdorf, Michael (2000).
Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change.
Harvard Business Review 78(2):66-76

Clayton M. Christensen, Scott D. Anthony & Erik A. Roth (2004)
Seeing What’s Next: Using the Theories of Innovation to Predict Industry Change
Boston: Harvard Business School Press)

Clayton M. Christensen, Sally Aaron & William Clark
“Disruption in Education”, in The Internet and the University:
Forum 2001, ed. Maureen Devlin, Richard Larson & Joel Meyerson
(Boulder, Colo.: EDUCAUSE and the Forum for the Future of Higher Education, 2002)

Coates Hamish
A model of online and general campus-based student engagement
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education;
Apr 2007, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p121-141, 21p, 4 charts, 1 diagram, 3 graphs

Condie Rae, Livingston Kay
Blending online learning with traditional approaches: changing practices
British Journal of Educational Technology; Mar2007, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p337-348, 12p

Contreras-Castillo Juan, Perez-Fragoso Carmen, Favela Jesus
Assessing the use of instant messaging in online learning environments
Interactive Learning Environments; Dec2006, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p205-218, 14p, 5 charts,
6 graphs,1c

Cravener Patricia
Shaping Students? Success in Distance and Online Education

Fowler Dale
Are On-Site Courses as Effective as Online?
Distance Education Report; 4/15/2005, Vol.9 Issue 8, p8-8, 1p

Hartman, J. L. & Truman-Davis, B. (2000).
Factors related to the satisfaction of faculty teaching online courses at the
University of Central Florida.
Paper presented at the 2000 Sloan Summer Workshop on Asynchronous Learning
Networks in Online Education 2 Proceedings of the 2000 Sloan Summer
Workshop on Asynchronous Learning Networks, J. Bourne & J.
Moore, Editors), 2000.





Higher Education Program and Policy Council of the American
Federation of Teachers (May, 2000).
Distance education: Guidelines for Good Practice. Washington, D.C.: American
Federation of Teachers.
http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/higher_ed/distance.pdf
(Accessed May 17, 2005)

Hiltz, R. & Goldman, R. (Eds.) (2005).
Learning together online: Research on asynchronous learning.
Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.

Howell, S., Williams, P., and Lindsay, N. (Fall 2003)
Thirty-two Trends Affecting Distance Education: An Informed Foundation for Strategic Planning.
Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4(3). Retrieved February 25, 2005, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall63/howell63.html

Hughes Gwyneth
Diversity, identity and belonging in e-learning communities: some theories and paradoxes
Teaching in Higher Education; Dec 2007, Vol. 12 Issue 5/6, p709-720, 12p

Jones, James G., Morales, Cesareo, Knezek, Gerald A.
3-Dimensional online learning environments: examining attitudes toward information technology between students in Internet-based 3-dimensional and face-to-face classroom instruction
Educational Media International; Sep2005, Vol. 42 Issue 3, p219-236, 18p

Kimmich, C. (1999).
Letter from Interim Chancellor
Christoph Kimmich to College Presidents dated March 22nd.
Subject: Distance Learning.

Lisa Prince (Jan. 2007)
A report from Delft University

Lowell Nathan O.
Collaborating Online: Learning Together in Community
Quarterly Review of Distance Education; Summer 2006, Vol. 7 Issue 2, p211-214, 4p

Lorenzetti Jennifer Patterson
How eLearning is Changing Higher Education: A New Look
Distance Education Report; 8/1/2005, Vol. 9 Issue 15, p4-7, 2p



Milam John, Voorhees Richard A., Bedard-Voorhees Alice
Assessment of online education: Policies, practices, and recommendations
New Directions for Community Colleges Summer2004, Vol.2004 Issue 126,
p73-85, 13p

Miller, G. (May 26, 2005).
Telephone interview with Gary Miller on his role in developing a university wide plan for online learning at the Pennsylvania State University.
Conducted May 26, 2005

Mason, Marilyn Gell, Chesemore, Sarah, Noord, Rachel Van
E-LEARNING'S NEXT WAVE
Library Journal; 11/15/2006, Vol. 131 Issue 19, p40-43, 4p, 1 chart
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=23298404&site=ehost-live
McMurray Andrew J.
College students, the GI Bill, and the proliferation of online learnig: A history of learning and contemporary challenges.
Internet & Higher Education; Apr2007, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p143-150, 8p

Minjuan Wang
Designing online courses that effectively engage learners from diverse cultural backgrounds.
British Journal of Educational Technology; Mar 2007, Vol. 38 Issue 2, p294-311, 18p

Noel-Levitz
National Online Learners Priorities Report (2006)

Noel-Levitz, Inc. (2004).
Retention Savings Worksheet. USA Group Noel-Levitz, Inc.
Retrieved February 25, 2004, from http://www.noellevitz.com/pdfs/RetSvgsWkst.pdf

Noble, David (2003).
Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education.
New York: Monthly Review Press.

Phipps, R. & Merisotis, J. (1999).
What’s the difference: A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of
distance learning in higher education.
Washington, D.C.: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.

Picciano, A.G. (1998).
Developing an asynchronous course model for a large, urban university.
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1).
http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v2n1/v2n1_picciano.asp
Accessed May 1, 2005

Picciano, A.G. (November 16, 1999).
Minutes of PSC/CUNY Technology Committee Meeting with College Administrators
regarding the Development of Online Learning at the City
University of New York.

Picciano, A.G. (2002).
Beyond Student Perceptions: Issues of Interaction, Presence, and Performance in an
Online Course.
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1).
http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v6n1/v6n1_picciano.asp
Accessed May 4, 2005

Price, Linda
Gender differences and similarities in online courses: challenging stereotypical views of women.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning; Oct2006, Vol. 22 Issue 5, p349-359, 11p, 4 charts
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=22207655&site=ehost-live
Rudenstine, N. (1997, February 21).
The Internet and education: A close fit.
The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 37-38.

Ragan Lawerence C.
Between the Clicks
Dstance Education Report; 8/15/2007, Vol. 11 Issue 16, p3-7, 2p

Ruch, R. (2001).
Higher education, Inc. The rise of the for-profit university.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Sargeant Joan, Curran Vernon, Allen Michael, Jarvis-Selinger Sandra & Ho Kendall
Facilitating interpersonal interaction and learning online: Linking theory and practice
Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions;
Spring 2006, Vol. 26 Issue 2, p128-136, 9p

Scott Geoff
Effective Change Management in Higher Education
Educause Review; Nov/Dec 2003, Vol. 38 Issue 6, p64-80, 10p, 1c


Shank Patti
Activities 101: New Tools for Collaboration, Part 1
Online Classroom; Oct2006, p4-5, 2p

Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., Pelz, W., & & Swan., K. (2000).
Measures of learning effectiveness in the SUNY Learning Network. Paper presented at the 2000 Sloan Summer Workshop on Asynchronous Learning Networks in Online
Education 2 Proceedings of the 2000 Sloan Summer Workshop on
Asynchronous Learning Networks,
J. Bourne & J. Moore, Editors), 2000.

Shirley Alexander
Designing Learning Activities for an International Online Student Body: What Have we Learned?
Journal of Studies in International Education; 2002, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p188-200, 13p

Smith Daniel R. & Ayers David F.
Culturally Responsive Pedagogy and Online Learning: Implications for the Globalized Community College.
Community College Journal of Research & Practice; Jun2006, Vol. 30 Issue 5/6, p401-415, 15p, 2 charts

Stacey Elizabeth, Smith Peter J., Barty Karin
Adult learners in the workplace: online learning and communities of practice
Distance Education; May2004, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p107-123, 17p, 1 chart

Sullivan, Patrick
“It’s Easier to Be Yourself When You Are Invisible”: Female College Students Discuss Their Online Classroom Experiences.
Innovative Higher Education; Winter 2002, Vol.27 Issue 2, p129, 16p

Swanson Sandra
Companies Emerge as Online Teachers
Information Week; 11/20/2000 Issue 813, p165, 2/3p, 2 graphs

US Department of Education, National Center for Education
Statistics (1997). Distance education in higher education
institutions, NCES 97-062. Washington, D.C.

Vonderwell Selma
An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: a case study.
Internet & Higher Education; Jan2003, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p77, 14p



Vonderwell Selma, Xin Liang, Alderman Kay
Asynchronous discussions and Assessment in Online Learning
Journal of Research on Technology in Education; Spring2007, Vol. 39 Issue 3,
p309- 328, 20p

Warger, T. (2005).
Calling all course management systems.
University Business Management (April, 2005)
http://universitybusiness.com/page.cfm?p=315
Accessed May 14, 2005

Woods Robert H.
How much communication is enough in online courses? – Exploring the relationship between frequency of instructor-initiated personal e-mail and learners’ perceptions of and participation in online learning.
International Journal of Instructional Media; 2002, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p377, 18p

Books

Maeroff, Gene I.
A Classroom of One: How Online Learning is changing our schools and colleges
Computer; Jul2004, Vol.37 Issue 7, p82-82, 1/4 p
Picciano, A.G. and Dzuiban, C. (Eds.) (2007).
Blended Learning: Research Perspectives. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.

Picciano, A.G. (Ed.) (2007).
Special Edition of the Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks Featuring Research on Online Learning in K-12 and Teacher Education. Vol. 11 (3).
Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.

Stoloff, David
A Classroom of One: How Online Learning is changing our schools and colleges
Teachers College Record; Feb2004, Vol. 106 Issue 2, p413-416, 4p

Articles, Chapters
Picciano, A.G. (in press).
Developing and nurturing resources for effective data-driven decision making practice. In Handbook of Data-based Decision Making in Education
(Kowalski, T.J. & Lasley, T. J., (editors). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, A Division of Routledge Publishing.

Picciano, A.G. (2007).
Interview with Chris Dede.
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(3). Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v11n3/v11n3_2dedeinterview_member.asp

Picciano, A.G. & Seaman, J. (2007).
K-12 online learning: A survey of U.S. school district administrators.
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(3). Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v11n3/v11n3_3piccianoseaman_member.asp

Bibliography #1

#1- Bibliography

Alcock Martha, Sayers Kevin W. & To Dutka Julia Yen-Heung
Transforming Institutional Culture in Regard to Student Learning: One University’s Experience
Assessment Update; Sep/Oct 2006, Vol. 18 Issue 5, p9-11, 3p

Allen, I. E. & Seaman, J. (2004).
Entering the mainstream: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2003 and 2004. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
http://www.sloan-c.org/resources/survey.asp
Accessed May 30,2005

Allen, I. E. & Seaman, J. (2003).
Sizing the opportunity: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2002 and 2003. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
http://www.sloan-c.org/resources/survey03.asp
Accessed May 30,2005

Anderson Bill
Dimensions of learning and support in an online community
Open Learning; Jun2004, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p183-190, 8p

Andy Guess (Nov, 2007).
Geography Emerges in Distance Ed.

Benson, Angela D.
An Exploratory Study of Online Postsecondary Education for Low-Income Working Adults: A View from Education Support Programs.
Journal of Negro Education; Winter2007, Vol. 76 Issue 1, p17-30, 14p

Carnevale Dan
As Distance Education Evolves, Choices Reflect Institutional Cultures
Chronicle of Higher Eduication; 5/4/2001, Vol. 47 Issue 34, pA37, 1/2p

Diana G. Oblinger, Ph.D. (2006)
Agile, Adaptable and Accountable

Distance education report (October 2007)
A Critical Look at the Use of Social Software in the Online Classroom

DuCharme-Hansen Barbara A. & DupinBryant Pamela A
Distance Education Plans: Course Planning for Online Adult Learners
Tech Trends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning
Mar/Apr2005, Vol. 49 Issue 2, p31-39, 9p

Dunlap Steven
From Isolation to Cooperation: The Changes that Technology Creates in Institutional Culture
Journal of Library Administration; 2001, Vol. 31 Issue ¾, p195, 12p

Eaton, J.S. (2000).
Assuring quality in distance learning. The CHEA Chronicle, 3(3).
http://www.chea.org/Chronicle/vol3/no3/focus.html
Accessed May 16, 2005

Erwin Danneels
Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A Critique and Research Agenda

Gaide Susan
Community College Identifies Student Expectations as Key Element in Online Retention
Distance Education Report; 8/1/2004, Vol.8 Issue 15, p4-6, 2p

Howell Scott L. & Eastmond Daniel V.
Distance Learning and University Effectiveness: Changing Educational Paradigms for
Online Learning
Quarterly Review of Distance Education; Summer 2005, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p169-172, 4p

I. Elaine Allen & Jeff Seaman
Changing the landscape: more institutions pursue online offerings
On the Horizon; Aug 2007, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p130-138, 9p

I. Elaine Allen & Jeff Seaman (2007)
Five Years of Growth in Online Learning

I. Elaine Allen & Jeff Seaman (2006)
Making the Grade – Online Education in the United States

Johnston, Jerome, Petty, Leslie I. & Shafer, Dehra
Handbook of Distance Education for Adult Learners, Second Edition
Distance Education Report; 7/1/2004, Vol. 8 Issue 13, p7-7, 1p

Kriger, T. (May, 2001).
A virtual revolution: Trends in the expansion of distance education. Washington, D.C.: American
Federation of Teachers.
http://www.aft.org/pubsreports/higher_ed/VirtualRevolution.pdf
Accessed May 17, 2005


Laura Horn & Stephanie Nevill (Jan/Feb 2007).
Profile of Undergradutes in U.S. Postsecondary Education Institutions: 2003 -2004, with a Special Analysis of Community College Students.

Longden Bernard
An Institutional Response to Changing Student Expectations and their Impact on
Retention Rates
Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management; Jul2006, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p173-187,
15p, 7 charts, 4 graphs

Magolda, Marcia B. Baxter
From the editor—Transforming institutional culture for learning.
About Campus; Mar2007, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p1-1, 1p
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=24630004&site=ehost-live
Mayadas, A.F. & Picciano, A.G. (2007).
Blended learning and localness: The means and the end.
Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11,1).
http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v11n1/v11n1_1mayadaspicciano_member.asp

Mia Katz (Sept/Oct. 2007).
Women in Business.
Vol. 59, Iss. 5; pg. 8, 4 pgs. Kansas City

McKeown Jim
Aligning Students’ Expectations with Realities of Online Learning
Online Classroom; Aug2004, p4-4, 1p

McLeod Willis B. & Young Jon M.
A chancellor’s vision: Establishing and institutional culture of student success
New Directions for Institutional Research; Spring 2005, Vol. 2005 Issue 125, p73-85,
13p

Najmuddin Shaik, Ph.D. (2005).
Marketing Distance Learning Programs and Courses: A Relationship Marketing Strategy

Nesbitt Susan
BOK REVIEW: Distance Learning and University Effectiveness: Changing Educational Paradigms for Online Learning. Edited by Caroline Howard, Karen Schenk, Richard Discenza
American Journal of Distance Education; Mar2005, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p65-66, 2p

Palloff Rena M. & Pratt Keith
Building Online Learning Communities: Effective Strategies for the Virtual Classroom (Second edition of Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace).
Distance Education Report; 2/1/2007, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p7-7, 1/3p

Pentina, Iryna & Neeley, Concha (2007)
Differences in Characteristics of Online versus Traditional Students: Implications for Target Marketing
Journal of Marketing for Higher Education; 2007, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p49-65

Picciano, A.G. (2006).
Online learning: Implications for higher education pedagogy and policy.
Journal of Thought, 41 (1), pp. 75-94.

Prensky, M. (2001).
Digital natives, digital immigrants
(Parts I and II). On the Horizon, NCB University Press, 9(1), 2001.
http://www.marcprensky.com/ Accessed May 26, 2005

Ron Bleed (Jan/Feb 2007). A disruptive Innovation Arrives
Shaik, N. (2003)
An Alternative Theoretical Framework to Analyze Failures in Decision Making: Application to Student Dropout in Asynchronous Learning Environments
Ninth Sloan-C International Conference on Asynchronous Learning Networks, Florida

Sierra Christina, Folger Terre
Building a Dynamic Online Learning Community among Adult Learners
Educational Media International; Jul2003, Vol. 40 Issue ½, p49, 13p

Scott Carlson & Dan Carnevale (Dec. 2002)
Debating the Demise of NYU Online

Stacey Elizabeth, Smith Peter J., Barty Karin
Adult learners in the workplace: online learning and communities of practice
Distance Education; May 2004, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p107-123, 17p, 1 chart

Valimaa Jussi
Culture and identity in higher education research
Higher Education; Sep98, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p119-138, 20p, 1 diagram

Vonderwell Selma
An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of
Students in an online course: a case study.
Internet & Higher Education; Jan 2003, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p77, 14p

Walker Paul
Innovating in Higher Education (Book Review)
Higher Education; Oct 2001, Vol. 42 Issue 3, p393, 2p

Bibliography: The Adult Undergraduate Online Learner Strains the Traditional Institutional Culture

This bibliography consists of cases and articles that directly relate to the title topic; for instance, differences in institutional culture that drive online learning paradigms for different types of institutions (private, public, and for-profit colleges and universities).

Bibliography: Other references peripheral to the topic of the adult undergraduate online learner

This bibliography consists of selected cases and articles that are peripherally related to the topic of the adult undergraduate online learner straining institutional culture.